Seeing is Believing

Both gave similar reasons for resigning. The difference is "where the attacks on Palin were unfounded nuisance lawsuits, caricatures on Saturday Night Live, and sexual jokes targeting her teenage daughters the attacks on Van Jones were attacks based on the things he stood for in his own words. No one impersonated him for laughs. No one said a single word about his family. No one made it a discussion of his personal character. It was about political issues from the start to the finish, and that's where the emphasis needs to remain." Thanks to Nathaniel Givens at americasright.com. He is right on the money, pointing out the difference between extreme liberal tactics and the Right approach. He further encourages us "to refuse to allow Obama and his remaining allies in the mainstream press to set the parameters for this debate. It's not about Glenn Beck being angry, or about talk show hosts with too much power. It's about Van Jones being a radical, and the questions that raises about Obama himself. And if all we can do is blog posts and emails and conversations with friends and acquaintances to get the word out, then that is exactly what we need to do."

Watch for more thug tactics from the Obama administration, and continue to pay attention to the people Obama has surrounding him. After all, he encouraged us to look to his advisers for clues to his governing approach.